Former Catalan Minister Homs facing trial “for listening to people’s demands”, says Puigdemont

Article published at Catalan News Agency, 19th September 2016

Photo: Francesc Homs with former Catalan President Artur Mas and other politicians arriving at the Supreme Court (by ACN)

Barcelona (CNA).- The Catalan President, Carles Puigdemont, said with regret that the former Catalan Minister and Catalan Democratic Party (PDC) spokesperson in the Spanish Parliament, Francesc Homs, has to testify this Monday in the Supreme Court “for listening to people’s demands and putting out ballot boxes” for 9-N symbolic vote. Puigdemont has recalled that just two years ago Scotland was allowed to vote in a referendum agreed with the British Government, but complained that former Catalan President, Artur Mas, former Catalan Vice President, Joana Ortega and former Catalan Minister for Education, Irene Rigau, will have to go to trial for having tried a “similar formula” to the one used by the Scottish and British Governments. 

Homs is being investigated for co-organising the informal consultation on independence in 2014. Former Catalan President, Artur Mas, who has been summonsed for the same case together with Catalan Vice President, Joana Ortega and former Catalan Minister for Education, Irene Rigau, backed Homs prior to his statement. Other Catalan Ministers such as Santi Vila, Meritxell Borràs, Meritxell Serret and Neus Munté, and the left-wing pro-independence party ERC spokesperson in the Spanish Government, Joan Tardà, were also present in front of the entrance to the Supreme Court.

Additional accusations added last May

The former Catalan Minister had to appear in the Court last March for having signed a letter which authorised the company T-Systems, which provided the computers used during the symbolic vote, to move on and continue with the requested tasks, despite the Spanish Constitutional Court (TC) suspension of the consultation. Homs admitted then his responsibility and authorship of the letter, but assured that the suspension of the participative process by the TC on the 4th of November, five days before the vote took place, was “ambiguous” and that, therefore, neither him nor any of the members of the government at that time can be accused of having disobeyed the suspension.

Read the full article here.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s